James Albert Johnson v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary
This text of 337 F.2d 856 (James Albert Johnson v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
337 F.2d 856
James Albert JOHNSON, Appellant,
v.
Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, Appellee.
No. 7795.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
October 22, 1964.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; William E. Doyle, Judge.
Richard J. Beacom, Westminster, Colo., for appellant.
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., and John E. Bush, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court, denying the writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed for the reasons so ably expressed by the opinion of that court reported in 234 F. Supp. 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
337 F.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-albert-johnson-v-harry-c-tinsley-warden-colorado-state-ca10-1964.