James Alba v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 7, 2014
Docket03-13-00345-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Alba v. State (James Alba v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Alba v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 7, 2014

NO. 03-13-00345-CR

James Alba, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BLANCO COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED; MODIFIED, AND AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error requiring reversal

in the court’s judgments of conviction for Counts Six, Seven, and Eight. Therefore, the Court

affirms the trial court’s judgments of conviction for Counts Six, Seven, and Eight. However,

there was error that requires correction in the judgments of conviction for Counts One, Two,

Three, Four, and Five. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgments of conviction

for Counts One, Two, Three, Four, and Five as follows: to delete “CONSECUTIVELY” and

instead reflect that the sentence shall run “CONCURRENTLY” and to delete the cumulation

order. The judgments, as modified, are affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to

pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Alba v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-alba-v-state-texapp-2014.