James Alba v. State
This text of James Alba v. State (James Alba v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 7, 2014
NO. 03-13-00345-CR
James Alba, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BLANCO COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED; MODIFIED, AND AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error requiring reversal
in the court’s judgments of conviction for Counts Six, Seven, and Eight. Therefore, the Court
affirms the trial court’s judgments of conviction for Counts Six, Seven, and Eight. However,
there was error that requires correction in the judgments of conviction for Counts One, Two,
Three, Four, and Five. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgments of conviction
for Counts One, Two, Three, Four, and Five as follows: to delete “CONSECUTIVELY” and
instead reflect that the sentence shall run “CONCURRENTLY” and to delete the cumulation
order. The judgments, as modified, are affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to
pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Alba v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-alba-v-state-texapp-2014.