James Alan Weatherford v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 12, 2015·No. 03-14-00528-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00528-CR

James Alan Weatherford, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 12-0465-K277, HONORABLE RICK J. KENNON, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of

the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and

file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate

record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely

filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court

to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written

verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or

before June 22, 2015. See id. at 321. It is ordered on June 11, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, Bourland

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Alan Weatherford v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

James Alan Weatherford v. State (James Alan Weatherford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)