James Agbeze v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 23, 2014·No. 01-13-00140-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-13-00140-CR Trial Court Cause Number: 1288928 Style: James Agbeze v. The State of Texas * Date motion filed : August 25, 2014 Type of motion: Rule 47.2(b) Motion to change notation Party filing motion: Appellant, James Agbeze

Ordered that motion is:

Granted Denied

Pursuant to Rule 47.2(b), an appellate court “must not change the notation after the Court of Criminal Appeals has acted on any party’s petition for discretionary review or other request for relief.” Appellant moved for an extension, which was granted by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on August 26, 2014. Consistent with the Rule 47.2(b) mandate, the designation of this Court’s opinion will not be changed from a memorandum opinion to an opinion.

Judge's signature: /s/ Harvey Brown Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

Date: September 23, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Agbeze v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

James Agbeze v. State (James Agbeze v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.