James A. Williams v. United States

219 F.2d 300
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 1955
Docket417
StatusPublished

This text of 219 F.2d 300 (James A. Williams v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James A. Williams v. United States, 219 F.2d 300 (9th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

219 F.2d 300

15 Alaska 448

James A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

Misc. No. 417.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 10, 1955.

James A. Williams, Steilacoom, Wash., in pro. per.

No appearances for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge and HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Williams has forwarded to this court a notice of appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, denying his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, and a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking to cause the sending of certain documents to be used on an appeal.

It nowhere appears that any notice of appeal was filed in the District Court as required by Rule 73 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. The notice and petition are ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. United States
219 F.2d 300 (Ninth Circuit, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 F.2d 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-a-williams-v-united-states-ca9-1955.