James A. Williams v. Chester E. Strand

239 F.2d 151, 16 Alaska 512, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4149
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 9, 1956·No. 15206_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Williams appeals from an order of the district court dismissing his complaint seeking damages for his imprisonment arising from the claimed perjury of Strand in the sworn criminal complaint against Williams, claiming the complaint stated falsely that appellant had given Strand on July 6, 1953 a bad check for $153.24, feloniously and with intent to defraud Strand. The complaint was filed February 4, 1956, next after Williams’ complaint in the case of Williams v. Mc-Nealy, 9 Cir., 239 F.2d 150.

As in that case, the Alaska statute, 3 A.C.L.A. § 55-2-7, limiting the period during which suit can be brought for such a tort to two years, is applicable. Williams here makes the same claim of the tolling of the statute by the provisions of 3 A.C.L.A., 1949, § 55-2-15, which statute is inapplicable for the reason stated in Williams v. McNealy, supra.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James A. Williams v. Chester E. Strand, 239 F.2d 151, 16 Alaska 512, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4149 (9th Cir. 1956).

239 F.2d 151 (James A. Williams v. Chester E. Strand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related