James A. Washington v. First Data Resources

13 F. App'x 484
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 9, 2001
Docket00-3187
StatusUnpublished

This text of 13 F. App'x 484 (James A. Washington v. First Data Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James A. Washington v. First Data Resources, 13 F. App'x 484 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James A. Washington appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims brought under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C.. §§ 2601-2654, against his former *485 employer, First Data Resources, Inc. (First Data).

After de novo review, we conclude the district court correctly granted judgment to First Data. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.214 (2000) (eligible employee is entitled to total of 12 workweeks of leave during any 12-month period when he cannot perform job due to serious health condition), § 825.802(d) (2000) (employer may require employee to comply with employer’s usual and customary notice and procedural requirements for requesting FMLA-qualifying leave), 825.303 (2000) (where need for FMLA leave is not foreseeable, employee should provide notice to employer as soon as practicable; employer will be expected to obtain any additional required information through informal means, and employee or spokesperson will be expected to provide more information when it can readily be accomplished); Ragsdale v. Wolverine Worldwide, Inc., 218 F.3d 933, 936-40 (8th Cir.2000) (standard of review; joining Eleventh Circuit in striking down 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.208(c) and 825.700(a) as improperly converting FMLA into statute providing additional 12 weeks of leave unless employer specifically notifies employee prospectively that he is using FMLA leave), cert. granted in part by — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 2548, 150 L.Ed.2d 716 (2001) .

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R 47B. Washington’s motion to amend his complaint is denied.

1

. The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ragsdale v. Wolverine Worldwide
218 F.3d 933 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 F. App'x 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-a-washington-v-first-data-resources-ca8-2001.