James A. Totton D/B/A Totton and Dunn Company v. Local 43 of United Association of Journeymen, Etc.

402 F.2d 270
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 21, 1968·No. 17778_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The company has appealed from a judgment of the District Court holding that the language of a collective bargaining agreement provided for binding arbitration of all grievances except jurisdictional disputes. The parties had submitted to a joint conference board the question whether the union had a right to cancel the collective bargaining agreement on the ground that the employer had violated its provisions. The joint conference board found in favor of the union and the District Judge held the company was bound by the decision.

Upon consideration, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the District Judge’s memorandum opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James A. Totton D/B/A Totton and Dunn Company v. Local 43 of United Association of Journeymen, Etc., 402 F.2d 270 (6th Cir. 1968).

402 F.2d 270 (James A. Totton D/B/A Totton and Dunn Company v. Local 43 of United Association of Journeymen, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related