James A. Proctor v. United States
218 F.2d 867, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 59, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2860
Opinion
Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crimes of housebreaking and larceny. The appellant urges that there was insufficient evidence to justify submission to the jury and that the trial court should have directed a verdict of not guilty. We find there was ample evidence to justify the verdict. See Lan-ham v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 857, 185 F.2d 435.
The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James A. Proctor v. United States, 218 F.2d 867, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 59, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2860 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
218 F.2d 867 (James A. Proctor v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lanham v. United States
185 F.2d 435 (D.C. Circuit, 1950)