James A. Proctor v. United States

D.C. Circuit

James A. Proctor v. United States

218 F.2d 867, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 59, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2860

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 3, 1955

Docket12442_1

StatusPublished

This text of 218 F.2d 867 (James A. Proctor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James A. Proctor v. United States, 218 F.2d 867, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 59, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2860 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crimes of housebreaking and larceny. The appellant urges that there was insufficient evidence to justify submission to the jury and that the trial court should have directed a verdict of not guilty. We find there was ample evidence to justify the verdict. See Lan-ham v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 857, 185 F.2d 435.

The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crimes of housebreaking and larceny. The appellant urges that there was insufficient evidence to justify submission to the jury and that the trial court should have directed a verdict of not guilty. We find there was ample evidence to justify the verdict. See Lan-ham v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 857, 185 F.2d 435.

The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 F.2d 867, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 59, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-a-proctor-v-united-states-cadc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack