James A. Marshall v. United States

D.C. Circuit

James A. Marshall v. United States

262 F.2d 456

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 23, 1959

Docket14604

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 F.2d 456 (James A. Marshall v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James A. Marshall v. United States, 262 F.2d 456 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of a motion filed in the District Court under Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code. Appellant says his trial counsel failed to call a certain person as a witness and that his attorney, after the verdict, argued on behalf of both appellant and a co-defendant, also convicted, in respect to the sentence to be imposed. Despite the earnest and skillful presentation of appellant’s points by counsel appointed to represent him on appeal, we find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of a motion filed in the District Court under Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code. Appellant says his trial counsel failed to call a certain person as a witness and that his attorney, after the verdict, argued on behalf of both appellant and a co-defendant, also convicted, in respect to the sentence to be imposed. Despite the earnest and skillful presentation of appellant’s points by counsel appointed to represent him on appeal, we find no error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 F.2d 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-a-marshall-v-united-states-cadc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack