James A. Holt v. United States Postal Service
This text of 59 F.3d 180 (James A. Holt v. United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
59 F.3d 180
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
James A. HOLT, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 94-3472.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 13, 1995.
Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and PLAGER, Circuit Judge
Judgment
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F.3d 180, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22841, 1995 WL 380591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-a-holt-v-united-states-postal-service-cafc-1995.