James A. Gentry v. Charles R. Hagan, Warden of the Federal Reformatory at El Reno, Oklahoma

234 F.2d 664, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3756
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 1956
Docket5376_1
StatusPublished

This text of 234 F.2d 664 (James A. Gentry v. Charles R. Hagan, Warden of the Federal Reformatory at El Reno, Oklahoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James A. Gentry v. Charles R. Hagan, Warden of the Federal Reformatory at El Reno, Oklahoma, 234 F.2d 664, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3756 (10th Cir. 1956).

Opinion

234 F.2d 664

James A. GENTRY
v.
Charles R. HAGAN, Warden of the Federal Reformatory at El
Reno, Oklahoma, et al.

No. 5376.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

May 24, 1956.

Arthur E. Ryman, Jr., Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Paul W. Cress, U.S. Atty., and H. Dale Cook and George Camp, Asst. U.S. Attys., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellees.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 F.2d 664, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-a-gentry-v-charles-r-hagan-warden-of-the-fed-ca10-1956.