James A. Gentry v. Charles R. Hagan, Warden of the Federal Reformatory at El Reno, Oklahoma
This text of 234 F.2d 664 (James A. Gentry v. Charles R. Hagan, Warden of the Federal Reformatory at El Reno, Oklahoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
234 F.2d 664
James A. GENTRY
v.
Charles R. HAGAN, Warden of the Federal Reformatory at El
Reno, Oklahoma, et al.
No. 5376.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
May 24, 1956.
Arthur E. Ryman, Jr., Denver, Colo., for appellant.
Paul W. Cress, U.S. Atty., and H. Dale Cook and George Camp, Asst. U.S. Attys., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellees.
Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 F.2d 664, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-a-gentry-v-charles-r-hagan-warden-of-the-fed-ca10-1956.