James A. Butler v. Roland T. Baehr, Chief Deputy Henrico County Duane Carter, Deputy Karen Bohannon, Nurse Arthur S. Harrow, M.D.

54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17371, 1995 WL 295520
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 16, 1995
Docket94-6963
StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 772 (James A. Butler v. Roland T. Baehr, Chief Deputy Henrico County Duane Carter, Deputy Karen Bohannon, Nurse Arthur S. Harrow, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James A. Butler v. Roland T. Baehr, Chief Deputy Henrico County Duane Carter, Deputy Karen Bohannon, Nurse Arthur S. Harrow, M.D., 54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17371, 1995 WL 295520 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James A. BUTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Roland T. BAEHR, Chief Deputy; Henrico County; Duane
Carter, Deputy; Karen Bohannon, Nurse; Arthur S.
Harrow, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6963.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 28, 1995.
Decided May 16, 1995.

James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. John Adrian Gibney, Jr., Sarah Jane Chittom, SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond, VA; Mark Sheridan Brennan, Michael Paul Curreri, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, MCCAMMON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Butler v. Baehr, No. CA-93-643-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17371, 1995 WL 295520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-a-butler-v-roland-t-baehr-chief-deputy-henri-ca4-1995.