Jamele v. State

401 So. 2d 930, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20637
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1981
DocketNo. 81-141
StatusPublished

This text of 401 So. 2d 930 (Jamele v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jamele v. State, 401 So. 2d 930, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20637 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence imposed because a general sentence is impermissible. Worth v. State, 380 So.2d 553 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). On remand it should be noted that the two year probation was a proper sentence for the charge of possession of cocaine but not as to the charges of possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia as these each carry a maximum sentence of one year. See §§ 893.13(l)(f), 893.13(3)(a)4, and 893.-13(3)(b). We remand and direct the trial court to impose a separate sentence for each offense.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Worth v. State
380 So. 2d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 So. 2d 930, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamele-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.