Jamele v. State
This text of 401 So. 2d 930 (Jamele v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence imposed because a general sentence is impermissible. Worth v. State, 380 So.2d 553 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). On remand it should be noted that the two year probation was a proper sentence for the charge of possession of cocaine but not as to the charges of possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia as these each carry a maximum sentence of one year. See §§ 893.13(l)(f), 893.13(3)(a)4, and 893.-13(3)(b). We remand and direct the trial court to impose a separate sentence for each offense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
401 So. 2d 930, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamele-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.