Jamele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jamele v. State

401 So. 2d 930, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20637

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1981·No. No. 81-141·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence imposed because a general sentence is impermissible. Worth v. State, 380 So.2d 553 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). On remand it should be noted that the two year probation was a proper sentence for the charge of possession of cocaine but not as to the charges of possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia as these each carry a maximum sentence of one year. See §§ 893.13(l)(f), 893.13(3)(a)4, and 893.-13(3)(b). We remand and direct the trial court to impose a separate sentence for each offense.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence imposed because a general sentence is impermissible. Worth v. State, 380 So.2d 553 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). On remand it should be noted that the two year probation was a proper sentence for the charge of possession of cocaine but not as to the charges of possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia as these each carry a maximum sentence of one year. See §§ 893.13(l)(f), 893.13(3)(a)4, and 893.-13(3)(b). We remand and direct the trial court to impose a separate sentence for each offense.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Jamele v. State, 401 So. 2d 930, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20637 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

401 So. 2d 930 (Jamele v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related