Jamal Desmond McClenton v. State
This text of Jamal Desmond McClenton v. State (Jamal Desmond McClenton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered September 6, 2016
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00624-CR No. 05-16-00625-CR
JAMAL DESMOND MCCLENTON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-26246-I, F16-75306-I
ORDER Appellant’s August 30, 2016 motion seeking appointment of an “MHR lawyer” is before
the Court. Our records show that on May 23, 2016, appellant was adjudicated guilty of
aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and found guilty of attempted theft of an automated
teller machine containing less than $300,000. In both cases, punishment was assessed at ten
years’ imprisonment. Before the plea and adjudication hearing, appellant signed documents
indicating he was waiving appointment of counsel. Nevertheless, the trial court determined that
appellant was indigent and appointed Bethany Stephens as counsel for appellant. Stephens
represented appellant during the plea and adjudication hearing. On June 1, 2016, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. There is no indication in our
records that counsel has been appointed to represent appellant on appeal. No docketing statement
has been filed, and the reporter’s record is overdue.
The Court GRANTS appellant’s motion to the extent we ORDER the trial court to
conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant remains indigent and would be entitled to the
appointment of appellate counsel. In the event the trial court determines appellant is entitled to
appointment of counsel, we ORDER the trial court to appoint counsel for appellant.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
the order appointing counsel or else written findings showing appellant is not entitled to counsel,
to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jamal Desmond McClenton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamal-desmond-mcclenton-v-state-texapp-2016.