Jamaica Savings Bank v. Greenbaum

256 A.D. 939, 11 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jamaica Savings Bank v. Greenbaum. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D. 984

Opinion

Motion to clarify provision allowing costs in the order of this court dated December 9, 1938, denied, without costs. [See 255 App. Div. 984.] There is no need for clarification. The provision simply means that only one bill of costs should be taxed jointly by all the respondents filing briefs, and this will include the disbursements of each respondent. The costs should be divided equally between the respective sets of respondents filing briefs, but each respondent is entitled to receive his or her disbursements. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.; Hagarty, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jamaica Savings Bank v. Greenbaum, 256 A.D. 939, 11 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

256 A.D. 939 (Jamaica Savings Bank v. Greenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.