Jamaica Buses, Inc. v. Connor
418 N.E.2d 673, 52 N.Y.2d 868, 437 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2190
Opinion
[869] OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]). Indeed, as we held in Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594, 600-601), it would have constituted an abuse of discretion to have failed to dismiss.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jamaica Buses, Inc. v. Connor, 418 N.E.2d 673, 52 N.Y.2d 868, 437 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2190 (N.Y. 1981).
418 N.E.2d 673 (Jamaica Buses, Inc. v. Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ryan v. Borg
201 A.D.2d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Fernandez v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
129 A.D.2d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Eaton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Inc.
438 N.E.2d 1119 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)