Jama v. King County Police

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 9 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-01151-JCC-BAT 10 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO 11 KING COUNTY POLICE, WESTERN PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATE HOSPITAL, 12 Defendants. 13 On August 25, 2021, Plaintiff Mahamed Ali Jama filed a Declaration and Application to 14 Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 1. 15 As a general rule, all parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a United 16 States District Court must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The Court may authorize the 17 commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees and costs of security therefor, by a 18 person who submits an affidavit that ... the person is unable to pay such fees or give security 19 therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, an action may proceed despite a failure to prepay 20 the filing fee only if leave to proceed IFP is granted by the Court. See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 21 F.3d 1178, 1177 (9th Cir.1999). 22 The Ninth Circuit has held “permission to proceed [IFP] is itself a matter of privilege and 23 not a right; denial of an [IFP] status does not violate the applicant’s right to due process.” Weller 1 v. Dickson, 314 F.2d 598, 600 (9th Cir.1963). The Court has broad discretion to grant or deny a 2 motion to proceed IFP. O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1990); Weller, 314 F.2d at 3 600-601. 4 By filing a request to proceed IFP, Plaintiff is asking the government to incur the filing

5 fee because he allegedly is unable to afford the costs necessary to proceed with his complaint. 6 However, Plaintiff has not provided sufficient information, which would allow the Court to 7 determine whether to grant his application. For example, Plaintiff did not properly complete the 8 following portions of his application: ¶ 3 (money received from sources other than employment); 9 ¶ 4 (cash, checking, or savings, on hand); ¶ 7 (monthly expenses incurred, such as housing, 10 transportation, utilities, loan payments, or other regular monthly expenses). 11 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to provide this additional information by 12 September 20, 2021 so that the Court may determine whether to grant or deny his IFP 13 application. 14 DATED this 30th day of August, 2021.

15 A 16 BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23