Jalkanson v. Am. Construction Co.

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 567, 1923 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1692
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 18, 1923
DocketNo. 4438
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 567 (Jalkanson v. Am. Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jalkanson v. Am. Construction Co., 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 567, 1923 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1692 (Ohio Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

VICKERY, J.

The Court of Appeals decided:

This ease was held in abeyance by this court, inasmuch as there were suits pending in the Supreme Court which involved this question, and we would have been compelled to confirm the court below, on the authority of the Patten case, but since that court has overruled the doctrine laid down in the Patten and kindred cases, and held that there was a liability in cases similar to the one at bar, we are compelled to reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the case to the Common Pleas Court, basing our decision upon the authority of the case of the Ohio Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Fender)'25 Abs. 467.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wellman v. Eberly
25 Ohio Law. Abs. 464 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ohio Law. Abs. 567, 1923 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jalkanson-v-am-construction-co-ohioctapp-1923.