J.A.L. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.A.L. v. State

264 So. 3d 1191

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 2019

DocketCase No. 2D17-4512

StatusPublished

This text of 264 So. 3d 1191 (J.A.L. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.A.L. v. State, 264 So. 3d 1191 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the record in keeping with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the disposition rendered after J.A.L. pleaded guilty to counts of grand theft of an automobile and dealing in stolen property, his withhold of adjudication after a disposition hearing on a third count for burglary of a dwelling, and his placement on juvenile probation for the various counts. We remand only for the trial court to enter a written order reflecting that the fourth count-grand theft-was merged with the dealing in stolen property count at the time of the plea as stated in the transcript of the plea hearing. See generally Lenker v. State, 151 So.3d 1273 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (affirming but remanding in an Anders proceeding for entry of a written record accurately reflecting the resolution of the various counts).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

KELLY and SALARIO, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the record in keeping with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the disposition rendered after J.A.L. pleaded guilty to counts of grand theft of an automobile and dealing in stolen property, his withhold of adjudication after a disposition hearing on a third count for burglary of a dwelling, and his placement on juvenile probation for the various counts. We remand only for the trial court to enter a written order reflecting that the fourth count-grand theft-was merged with the dealing in stolen property count at the time of the plea as stated in the transcript of the plea hearing. See generally Lenker v. State, 151 So.3d 1273 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (affirming but remanding in an Anders proceeding for entry of a written record accurately reflecting the resolution of the various counts).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

KELLY and SALARIO, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 So. 3d 1191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jal-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack