Jakuboski v. Matson Navigation Co.

269 A.D. 849, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4220
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jakuboski v. Matson Navigation Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 A.D. 859

Opinion

— On reargument of the appeal in this ease (264 App. Div. 735) the order, dated February 2,1942, is reversed on the law, without costs, defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to serve a reply to the fifth and sixth affirmative defenses contained in the amended answer is denied, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion to strike out the fifth and sixth affirmative defenses contained in the amended answer is granted, without costs. (Ricciardi v. American Export Lines, 268 App. Div. 606, affd. 294 N. Y. 812.) The pleadings will be deemed to be amended accordingly. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 672.] [See post, p. 941.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jakuboski v. Matson Navigation Co., 269 A.D. 849, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

269 A.D. 849 (Jakuboski v. Matson Navigation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ricciardi v. American Export Lines, Inc.
62 N.E.2d 241 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
Ricciardi v. American Export Lines, Inc.
268 A.D. 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)