Jakita Murphy v. Pamela Malott
This text of Jakita Murphy v. Pamela Malott (Jakita Murphy v. Pamela Malott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 23-2986 ___________________________
Jakita Murphy
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nurzuhal Faust, Warden, McPherson Unit, ADC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
Pam Malott, Sgt., McPherson Unit, ADC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
Cody Boggs, Cpl., McPherson Unit, ADC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Northern ____________
Submitted: April 1, 2024 Filed: April 4, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before BENTON, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Jakita Murphy appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment, see De Rossitte v. Correct Care Sols., LLC, 22 F.4th 796, 802 (8th Cir. 2022) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment); see also King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (dismissal for failure to exhaust remedies is reviewed de novo); and declined to address the new claims Murphy sought to assert after the close of discovery, see Bell v. Allstate Life Ins. Co., 160 F.3d 452, 454 (8th Cir. 1998) (denial of motion to amend complaint reviewed for abuse of discretion); see also 3M v. Superior Insulating Tape Co., 284 F.2d 478, 481 (8th Cir. 1960) (trial court exercises its discretion in determining whether to grant leave to supplement pleadings). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the motion for counsel. ______________________________
1 The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., then Chief Judge, now United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the reports and recommendations of the Honorable Edie R. Ervin, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jakita Murphy v. Pamela Malott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jakita-murphy-v-pamela-malott-ca8-2024.