Jake Earl Hendrix v. State
This text of Jake Earl Hendrix v. State (Jake Earl Hendrix v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JAKE HENDRIX,
APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE
This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted of failure to register as a sex offender, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for two years.
To invoke the appellate court's full jurisdiction, the notice of appeal in a criminal case must bear the trial court's certification of the appellant's right to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). However, the certification may be added to the record by timely amendment or supplementation. Id. Appellant's notice of appeal does not include the required certification.
On May 27, 2008, this court notified Appellant through his counsel, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 25.2 and 37.1, that the notice of appeal does not include the trial court certification. The notice also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before June 11, 2008, the clerk's record was amended to include the required certification.
The deadline for responding to this court's notice has expired, and the clerk's record has not been amended to show Appellant's right to appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Opinion delivered June 25, 2008.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jake Earl Hendrix v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jake-earl-hendrix-v-state-texapp-2008.