Jakaboski v. Guinta

294 A.2d 87, 29 Conn. Super. Ct. 498, 29 Conn. Supp. 498, 1972 Conn. Super. LEXIS 181
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 27, 1972·No. File No. 13359·Published

Opinion

The question raised by this motion is whether the Superior Court has exclusive jurisdiction *Page 499 of matters involving support for minor children subsequent to a foreign decree of divorce or whether such an action may be maintained in the Court of Common Pleas.

There appear to be no Supreme Court cases directly in point but the Court of Common Pleas has equitable jurisdiction and, historically, has heard and decided such matters. Broderick v. Broderick,7 Conn. Sup. 60; Przybylo v. Przybylo, 13 Conn. Sup. 474.

Certainly if the minor were a nonresident and the defendant a resident, the Court of Common Pleas would have jurisdiction under the provisions of the Uniform Reciprocal Support Act. General Statutes §§ 17-327 — 17-355b.

The motion to erase is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jakaboski v. Guinta, 294 A.2d 87, 29 Conn. Super. Ct. 498, 29 Conn. Supp. 498, 1972 Conn. Super. LEXIS 181 (Colo. Ct. App. 1972).

294 A.2d 87 (Jakaboski v. Guinta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broderick v. Broderick
7 Conn. Super. Ct. 60 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1939)
Przybylo v. Przybylo
13 Conn. Super. Ct. 474 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1945)