Jaison Armstrong v. H. Alecia

Opinion

_________________________________ ) JAISON ARMSTRONG, ) No. LA CV 19-01902-VBF-AFM ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ) v. ) Adopting Report & Recommendation: ) H. ALECIA (Warden, ) Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition; Sierra Conservation Center), ) Directing Entry of Separate Judgment; ) Terminating and Closing Case (JS-6) Respondent. ) _________________________________ The Court has reviewed the pro se prisoner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, CM/ECF Document (“Doc”) 1; the respondent warden’s answer memorandum (Doc 14); the transcripts, opinions, and orders of the California state courts and the other records in this case (Docs 16-1 though 16-16); the Magistrate Judge’s August 18, 2019 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”); and the applicable law. Petitioner did not file any objection to the R&R, nor did he move for an extension of the objection deadline, and the objection deadline elapsed one month ago, see Doc 19. Having found no error of law, fact, or logic in the R&R, the Court will accept the Magistrate Judge's factual findings and legal conclusions and implement his recommendations. The August 19, 2019 Report and Recommendation [Doc # 18] is ADOPTED. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc # 1] is DENIED. Final judgment consistent with this order will be entered separately as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). See Jayne v. Sherman, 706 F.3d 994, 1009 (9th Cir. 2013). The Court will rule on a certificate of appealability by separate order. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The case SHALL BE TERMINATED and closed (JS-6). Dated: October 9, 2019 biker (avebooahe Hon. Valerie Baker Fairbank Senior United States District Judge