Jaimie Davis v. WFP Securities Corp., et al.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided April 7, 2026·No. 2:26-cv-00120·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 Jaimie Davis, Case No. 2:26-cv-00120-RFB-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9] v. [Docket No. 13] WFP Securities Corp., et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend the time for service given his 13] current efforts to obtain waivers of service. Docket No. 13.' The circumstances presented justify 14] a short extension. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Accordingly, the motion to extend is GRANTED and the service deadline is EXTENDED to May 29, 2026. 17 Dated: April 7, 2026 . Nancy J. Koppé, _ 19 United Statés-Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

' The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaimie Davis v. WFP Securities Corp., et al., (D. Nev. 2026).

Jaimie Davis v. WFP Securities Corp., et al. (Jaimie Davis v. WFP Securities Corp., et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erickson v. Pardus
551 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 2007)