Jaimie Davis v. WFP Securities Corp., et al.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 Jaimie Davis, Case No. 2:26-cv-00120-RFB-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9] v. [Docket No. 13] WFP Securities Corp., et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend the time for service given his 13] current efforts to obtain waivers of service. Docket No. 13.' The circumstances presented justify 14] a short extension. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Accordingly, the motion to extend is GRANTED and the service deadline is EXTENDED to May 29, 2026. 17 Dated: April 7, 2026 . Nancy J. Koppé, _ 19 United Statés-Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
' The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jaimie Davis v. WFP Securities Corp., et al. (Jaimie Davis v. WFP Securities Corp., et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.