Jaime v. 244 West 99th Street, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jaime v. 244 West 99th Street, Inc.

25 A.D.3d 492, 807 N.Y.S.2d 300

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.3d 492 (Jaime v. 244 West 99th Street, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jaime v. 244 West 99th Street, Inc., 25 A.D.3d 492, 807 N.Y.S.2d 300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered October 13, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted summary judgment in favor of defendant West Side Residence Associates for dismissal of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks recovery for injuries sustained when she fell on an accumulation of snow and ice while walking on the sidewalk in front of defendants’ premises, some five days after a major snow storm. On this record, there are no triable issues of fact as to whether defendant West Side, in the course of removing snow from the area in question, created or exacerbated a dangerous condition contributing to plaintiff’s injury (see Gabelmann v Circle Line Sightseeing Yachts, 254 AD2d 148 [1998]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered October 13, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted summary judgment in favor of defendant West Side Residence Associates for dismissal of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks recovery for injuries sustained when she fell on an accumulation of snow and ice while walking on the sidewalk in front of defendants’ premises, some five days after a major snow storm. On this record, there are no triable issues of fact as to whether defendant West Side, in the course of removing snow from the area in question, created or exacerbated a dangerous condition contributing to plaintiff’s injury (see Gabelmann v Circle Line Sightseeing Yachts, 254 AD2d 148 [1998]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.3d 492, 807 N.Y.S.2d 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaime-v-244-west-99th-street-inc-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack