Jaime Reyes v. State
This text of Jaime Reyes v. State (Jaime Reyes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-12-00076-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
MAY 14, 2012
JAIME FIERRO REYES, APPELLANT
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
FROM THE 222ND DISTRICT COURT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY;
NO. CR-11B-019; HONORABLE ROLAND D. SAUL, JUDGE
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ABATE AND REMAND
On February 6, 2012, appellant Jaime Fierro Reyes filed a notice of appeal from
his conviction for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentence
confining him in prison. By written request, the clerk and reporter each sought until April
28, 2012, to file their respective portions of the record on the ground that appellant had
not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record. According to the trial court clerk’s
information form filed in this court, appellant was not declared indigent and is
represented by retained counsel on appeal. By letter, we notified appellant’s counsel of appellant’s payment obligations and
directed counsel to file a writing by a specified date with the clerk of this court indicating
acceptable arrangements were made with the clerk and reporter. We directed the clerk
and reporter to file a status report if the record was not filed by April 28, 2012.
Appellant’s counsel made no response to the court’s directive. Status reports from the
reporter and clerk, filed May 4 and 7 respectively, indicate appellant’s counsel has not
paid or made arrangements to pay for the record.
Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court.
See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(2). On remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to
immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: (1)
whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) if appellant desires to prosecute
this appeal, whether appellant is indigent; (3) if appellant desires to prosecute this
appeal and is indigent, whether he is entitled to have the appellate record furnished
without charge; (4) whether present counsel for appellant has abandoned the appeal;
(5) if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and is indigent, whether appellant’s
present counsel should be replaced with appointed counsel; and (6) what orders, if any,
should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to
dismiss appellant’s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal or, if
appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently
pursued.
The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and
file appropriate findings of fact, conclusions of law, recommendations and orders, and
2 cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record; (3) cause any live hearing,
if conducted, to be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter’s record; (4)
have a record of the proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not
included in the supplemental clerk’s record or the supplemental reporter’s record; and
(5) cause the records of the proceedings to be sent to this court. In the absence of a
request for extension of time from the trial court, the supplemental clerk’s record,
supplemental reporter’s record, if any, and any additional proceeding records, including
any orders, findings, conclusions, and recommendations, are to be sent so as to be
received by the clerk of this court not later than June 14, 2012.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jaime Reyes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaime-reyes-v-state-texapp-2012.