Jaime Ramirez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 15, 2016
Docket08-16-00074-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jaime Ramirez v. State (Jaime Ramirez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaime Ramirez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-16-00074-CR JAIME RAMIREZ, § Appeal from the Appellant, § County Court at Law No. 7 v. § of El Paso County, Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS, § (TC# 20100C08395) State. §

§ ORDER

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require the trial court to enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2). The certification must include a notice that the defendant has been informed of his rights concerning an appeal, as well as any right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(d). The certification must be signed by the defendant and a copy must be given to him. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(d).

The clerk’s record in this cause contains the trial court’s certification pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), but the certification is defective because it has not been signed by the defendant. Accordingly, we direct the trial court to remedy the defect in the certification by preparing and filing a “Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal” which includes the defendant’s signature. TEX.R.APP. P. 25.2(d). All of the provisions of 25.2(d) should be complied with including the requirement that the defendant be informed of his rights concerning an appeal, as well as any right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court is further ordered to forward the certification to this Court by means of a supplemental clerk’s record within thirty days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of July, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jaime Ramirez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaime-ramirez-v-state-texapp-2016.