Jaime Mendez v. Paul C. Kavanaugh

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 15, 2011·No. 13-11-00622-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00622-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

JAIME MENDEZ, Appellant,

v.

PAUL C. KAVANAUGH, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jaime Mendez, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered against him in

favor of appellee, Paul C. Kavanaugh. On November 2, 2011, the Clerk of this Court

notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on October

31, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Mary Ann Espinoza, had notified this Court

that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the

defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised

that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice,

the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 15th day of December, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaime Mendez v. Paul C. Kavanaugh, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Jaime Mendez v. Paul C. Kavanaugh (Jaime Mendez v. Paul C. Kavanaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.