Jaime Mendez v. Paul C. Kavanaugh
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00622-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
JAIME MENDEZ, Appellant,
v.
PAUL C. KAVANAUGH, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Jaime Mendez, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered against him in
favor of appellee, Paul C. Kavanaugh. On November 2, 2011, the Clerk of this Court
notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on October
31, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Mary Ann Espinoza, had notified this Court
that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the
defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised
that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice,
the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 15th day of December, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jaime Mendez v. Paul C. Kavanaugh (Jaime Mendez v. Paul C. Kavanaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.