Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corning

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corning. Read the opinion of the Court — 885 F.3d 186
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 4, 2018·No. 16-2653·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT March 29, 2018

No. 16-2653

JAIME GONZALEZ; PATRICIA WRIGHT; KEVIN WEST; GERALD BOEHM; EDWARD MAAG; DIANE MAAG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants

v.

OWENS CORNING; OWENS CORNING SALES LLC

(W.D. Pa. No. 2-13-cv-01378)

Present: CHAGARES, JORDAN, and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges.

1. Motion by Appellants to amend Opinion.

Respectfully, Clerk/kr

_________________________________ORDER________________________________ The foregoing Motion is GRANTED. The opinion will be amended to remove “Earthrise Law Center” from page 2 of the opinion.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas M. Hardiman Circuit Judge

Dated: April 4, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corning, (3d Cir. 2018).

Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corning (Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.