Jaime Gabriel Morales Reyes v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of the United States, et al.

S.D. California

Jaime Gabriel Morales Reyes v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of the United States, et al.

District Court, S.D. California·Decided January 28, 2026·No. 3:26-cv-00528·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 JAIME GABRIEL MORALES REYES, Case No. 26-cv-00528-BAS

14 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION 15 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 PAM BONDI, Attorney General of the United States, et al., 17 Respondents. 18 19

20 Presently before the Court are a Petition and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus 21 Ad Prosequendum filed on January 27, 2026. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) The Petition alleges 22 Petitioner was arrested on January 27, 2026, and has not been presented for an initial 23 appearance in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5. Petitioner seeks a writ 24 of habeas corpus ad prosequendum directing Respondents to immediately present 25 Petitioner to a magistrate judge for arraignment. 26 Upon review, the Petition and Application do not demonstrate that Petitioner is 27 entitled to relief. Cf. United States v. Pimental, 755 F.3d 1095, 1103–04 (9th Cir. 2014) 28 (finding a four-day delay in presentment over a holiday weekend was unreasonable and 1 ||unnecessary). Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Petition 2 Application. (ECF Nos. 1-2.) In the event that Petitioner is not arraigned by January 3 2026, Petitioner may renew the Petition and Application. Further, the Clerk of Court 4 || shall serve this Order on the U.S. Attorney’s Office and close the case. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 ~ 7 || DATED: January 28, 2026 (yatta Bahar □□ Hon. Cynthia Bashant, Chief Judge 8 United States District Court 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 JAIME GABRIEL MORALES REYES, Case No. 26-cv-00528-BAS

14 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION 15 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 PAM BONDI, Attorney General of the United States, et al., 17 Respondents. 18 19

20 Presently before the Court are a Petition and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus 21 Ad Prosequendum filed on January 27, 2026. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) The Petition alleges 22 Petitioner was arrested on January 27, 2026, and has not been presented for an initial 23 appearance in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5. Petitioner seeks a writ 24 of habeas corpus ad prosequendum directing Respondents to immediately present 25 Petitioner to a magistrate judge for arraignment. 26 Upon review, the Petition and Application do not demonstrate that Petitioner is 27 entitled to relief. Cf. United States v. Pimental, 755 F.3d 1095, 1103–04 (9th Cir. 2014) 28 (finding a four-day delay in presentment over a holiday weekend was unreasonable and 1 ||unnecessary). Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Petition 2 Application. (ECF Nos. 1-2.) In the event that Petitioner is not arraigned by January 3 2026, Petitioner may renew the Petition and Application. Further, the Clerk of Court 4 || shall serve this Order on the U.S. Attorney’s Office and close the case. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 ~ 7 || DATED: January 28, 2026 (yatta Bahar □□ Hon. Cynthia Bashant, Chief Judge 8 United States District Court 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Jaime Gabriel Morales Reyes v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of the United States, et al., (S.D. Cal. 2026).

Pincite

Jaime Gabriel Morales Reyes v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of the United States, et al. (Jaime Gabriel Morales Reyes v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of the United States, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related