Jaime Esparza, District Attorney, Relator v. Honorable Sam Medrano

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 29, 2011
DocketWR-76,817-01
StatusPublished

This text of Jaime Esparza, District Attorney, Relator v. Honorable Sam Medrano (Jaime Esparza, District Attorney, Relator v. Honorable Sam Medrano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaime Esparza, District Attorney, Relator v. Honorable Sam Medrano, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-76,817-01

STATE OF TEXAS ex rel. HON. JAIME ESPARZA, District Attorney,

34th Judicial District, Relator



v.



THE HONORABLE SAM MEDRANO, Judge, 409th District Court, Respondent



ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM CAUSE NO. 76187-41-1

IN THE 409TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

EL PASO COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O R D E R



We have before us a motion for leave to file an application for writ of mandamus, an application for writ of mandamus, and a motion for an emergency stay of the trial court proceedings.

Before deciding whether to grant relator leave to file its petition, we believe the respondent, the Honorable Sam Medrano, Judge of the 409th Judicial District Court, and the real party in interest, Daniel Villegas, should have the opportunity to respond. In addition to any other matter they deem relevant to the issue before this Court, we are specifically interested in their responses to the following questions:

(1) Was an order designating issues issued in the underlying habeas action? If so, when, and what issues were designated?



(2) By what authority did the trial court order the production of the recordings of the complained-of telephone conversations?



Within 30 days of the date of this order, Judge Medrano, or his representative, and a representative of the real party in interest, may file their respective responses in this Court. The District Clerk is also ordered to supplement the record with a copy of the habeas application filed in the underlying action. The underlying habeas proceedings currently pending in the trial court are stayed pending further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 29th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011.



Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jaime Esparza, District Attorney, Relator v. Honorable Sam Medrano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaime-esparza-district-attorney-relator-v-honorabl-texcrimapp-2011.