Jaime Cantu v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 30, 2011·No. 13-10-00680-CR·Published

Opinion

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00680-CR

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JAIME CANTU,                                                                               Appellant,

                                                             v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                 Appellee.

                           On appeal from the 105th District Court

                                       of Kleberg County, Texas.

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

     Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

                               Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, Jaime Cantu, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to withdraw his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to withdraw the appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

30th day of June, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaime Cantu v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Jaime Cantu v. State (Jaime Cantu v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.