Jahmir Frank v. Good Samaritan Hosp.
This text of Jahmir Frank v. Good Samaritan Hosp. (Jahmir Frank v. Good Samaritan Hosp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 21a0193n.06
Case No. 19-4268
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Apr 15, 2021 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk JAHMIR CHRISTOPHER FRANK, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT v. ) COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN ) DISTRICT OF OHIO GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF ) CINCINNATI, LLC, ) OPINION Defendant-Appellee. )
BEFORE: ROGERS, BUSH, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. The district court dismissed Jahmir Frank’s suit for negligent destruction
of medical records after Frank failed to make any argument that Ohio recognizes such a tort. His
brief before us is similarly “devoid of any legal argument” in that regard. Cooper v. Commercial
Sav. Bank, 591 F. App’x 508, 509 (6th Cir. 2015). The striking legal emptiness of his brief means
that he abandoned the argument and forfeited his appeal. Id. Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jahmir Frank v. Good Samaritan Hosp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jahmir-frank-v-good-samaritan-hosp-ca6-2021.