Jaguar Cars North American Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Jaguar Cars North American Corp. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 706

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 7, 1961

DocketReap. Dec. 10020; Entry Nos. 18465; 20404

StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 706 (Jaguar Cars North American Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jaguar Cars North American Corp. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 706 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, Judge:

When the appeals for reappraisement listed above were called for trial on April 19, 1961, counsel for defendant moved for their dismissal for lack of prosecution.

The records of the court reveal that said cases first appeared on the calendar on September 2, 1958, at San Francisco, the port of entry. Upon request of counsel for plaintiff, numerous continuances thereof were granted, and the actions were transferred to New York for trial. Notwithstanding that, on October 18, 1960, said cases were marked “continued for final disposition,” counsel for plaintiff failed to proceed to trial.

The motion to dismiss for want of prosecution is, therefore, granted.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, Judge:

When the appeals for reappraisement listed above were called for trial on April 19, 1961, counsel for defendant moved for their dismissal for lack of prosecution.

The records of the court reveal that said cases first appeared on the calendar on September 2, 1958, at San Francisco, the port of entry. Upon request of counsel for plaintiff, numerous continuances thereof were granted, and the actions were transferred to New York for trial. Notwithstanding that, on October 18, 1960, said cases were marked “continued for final disposition,” counsel for plaintiff failed to proceed to trial.

The motion to dismiss for want of prosecution is, therefore, granted.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 Cust. Ct. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaguar-cars-north-american-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1961.