Jaglom v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK

New York Court of Appeals

Jaglom v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK

915 N.E.2d 1165, 13 N.Y.3d 768

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 15, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 915 N.E.2d 1165 (Jaglom v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jaglom v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK, 915 N.E.2d 1165, 13 N.Y.3d 768 (N.Y. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Questions of fact exist whether plaintiffs had a reasonable good-faith belief that the tenants in an underlying libel action against them would not seek to hold them liable, precluding dismissal of their action against the insurer (see Argentina v Otsego Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 86 NY2d 748, 750 [1995]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI