Jaglom v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK

915 N.E.2d 1165, 13 N.Y.3d 768
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Questions of fact exist whether plaintiffs had a reasonable good-faith belief that the tenants in an underlying libel action against them would not seek to hold them liable, precluding dismissal of their action against the insurer (see Argentina v Otsego Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 86 NY2d 748, 750 [1995]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaglom v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK, 915 N.E.2d 1165, 13 N.Y.3d 768 (N.Y. 2009).

915 N.E.2d 1165 (Jaglom v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raner v. Security Mutual Insurance
102 A.D.3d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)