Jagiello v. City of Lackawanna

229 N.E.2d 451, 20 N.Y.2d 710, 282 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1301
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 7, 1967·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. The present incumbent was validly classified into the noncompetitive class and, therefore, is entitled to retain the position. (See Matter of Cook v. Kern, 278 N. Y. 195; Bressler v. Board of Higher Edue. of City of N. Y., 298 N. Y. 112.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jagiello v. City of Lackawanna, 229 N.E.2d 451, 20 N.Y.2d 710, 282 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1301 (N.Y. 1967).

229 N.E.2d 451 (Jagiello v. City of Lackawanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Cook v. Kern
15 N.E.2d 575 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Bressler v. Bd. of Higher Education of City of N.Y.
81 N.E.2d 43 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)