Jaggers v. State

542 So. 2d 1069, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1191, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2708, 1989 WL 49609
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2276
StatusPublished

This text of 542 So. 2d 1069 (Jaggers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaggers v. State, 542 So. 2d 1069, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1191, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2708, 1989 WL 49609 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, whose offense was committed prior to the effective date of the sentencing guidelines, argues that he was improperly sentenced on remand under amended guidelines which were not in effect at the time he originally elected to be sentenced under the guidelines. However, the record indicates that appellant’s trial counsel did not object to the guidelines used at his sentencing, thereby waiving the issue on direct appeal.

AFFIRMED without prejudice to any right appellant may have to seek relief via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, [1070]*1070alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

NIMMONS, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 1069, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1191, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2708, 1989 WL 49609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaggers-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.