Jafri v. Jafri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jafri v. Jafri

292 A.D.2d 425, 738 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2532

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 292 A.D.2d 425 (Jafri v. Jafri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jafri v. Jafri, 292 A.D.2d 425, 738 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties [426]*426were divorced by judgment dated September 21, 2000, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated September 21, 2000, as, without a hearing, denied his motion to hold the plaintiff in contempt.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under Domestic Relations Law § 245, a spouse may be held in contempt if he or she fails to make the required maintenance or child support payment. In this case, there was no showing that the plaintiff failed to make any such payment. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to hold the plaintiff in contempt. Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which the parties [426]*426were divorced by judgment dated September 21, 2000, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated September 21, 2000, as, without a hearing, denied his motion to hold the plaintiff in contempt.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under Domestic Relations Law § 245, a spouse may be held in contempt if he or she fails to make the required maintenance or child support payment. In this case, there was no showing that the plaintiff failed to make any such payment. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to hold the plaintiff in contempt. Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 A.D.2d 425, 738 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jafri-v-jafri-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack