Jafri v. Jafri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jafri v. Jafri

267 A.D.2d 352, 699 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13125

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 352 (Jafri v. Jafri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jafri v. Jafri, 267 A.D.2d 352, 699 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered December 6, 1994, the defendant former husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated January 9, 1998, which, inter alia, upon determining the value of the plaintiff former wife’s medical license, equitably distributed the value of the license.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find no basis to disturb the Supreme Court’s valuation and equitable distribution of the plaintiffs medical license (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5]; McSparron v McSparron, 87 NY2d 275; O’Brien v O’Brien, 66 NY2d 576).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered December 6, 1994, the defendant former husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated January 9, 1998, which, inter alia, upon determining the value of the plaintiff former wife’s medical license, equitably distributed the value of the license.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find no basis to disturb the Supreme Court’s valuation and equitable distribution of the plaintiffs medical license (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5]; McSparron v McSparron, 87 NY2d 275; O’Brien v O’Brien, 66 NY2d 576).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 352, 699 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jafri-v-jafri-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack