Jafra Steel Corp. v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jafra Steel Corp. v. City of Miami

184 So. 2d 908, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5765

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jafra Steel Corp. v. City of Miami. Read the opinion of the Court — 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4118 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1966·No. No. 64-866·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

■ Pursuant to mandate of the Supreme Court issued on its opinion -and judgment (City of Miami v. Jafr-a Steel Corporation, Fla. 1966, 184 So.2d 178, filed March 9, 1966), quashing our. decision filed April 20, 1965, (174 So.2d 624), this court’s said -opinion and judgment is vacated and our mandate previously filed is withdrawn, the Supreme Court’s judgment is made the-judgment of this court, and the order of the trial court denying motion for transfer of the cause to the circuit court and striking the counterclaim is affirmed. In our earlier opinion of April 20, 1965 we omitted ruling on the appellants’ contention that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. On consideration thereof in the light of the record and briefs we conclude no error has been made ■to appear, and affirm. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

■ Pursuant to mandate of the Supreme Court issued on its opinion -and judgment (City of Miami v. Jafr-a Steel Corporation, Fla. 1966, 184 So.2d 178, filed March 9, 1966), quashing our. decision filed April 20, 1965, (174 So.2d 624), this court’s said -opinion and judgment is vacated and our mandate previously filed is withdrawn, the Supreme Court’s judgment is made the-judgment of this court, and the order of the trial court denying motion for transfer of the cause to the circuit court and striking the counterclaim is affirmed. In our earlier opinion of April 20, 1965 we omitted ruling on the appellants’ contention that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. On consideration thereof in the light of the record and briefs we conclude no error has been made ■to appear, and affirm. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

It is so ordered.

Jafra Steel Corp. v. City of Miami, 184 So. 2d 908, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5765 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

184 So. 2d 908 (Jafra Steel Corp. v. City of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related