Jaffe v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Jaffe v. Pennsylvania Railroad

94 N.Y.S. 1150

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 22, 1905·Published

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

Inasmuch as the baggageman testified that the plaintiff told him that there were eyeglasses and other goods in the bag, and no one contradicted him, the liability of the defendant seems established. Saleeby v. Cent. R. R. of N. J., 99 App. Div. 163, 90 N. Y. Supp. 1042. The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLEAN, J.

Inasmuch as the baggageman testified that the plaintiff told him that there were eyeglasses and other goods in the bag, and no one contradicted him, the liability of the defendant seems established. Saleeby v. Cent. R. R. of N. J., 99 App. Div. 163, 90 N. Y. Supp. 1042. The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Jaffe v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 94 N.Y.S. 1150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

94 N.Y.S. 1150 (Jaffe v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related