Jaffe v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 94 N.Y.S. 1150 (Jaffe v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Inasmuch as the baggageman testified that the plaintiff told him that there were eyeglasses and other goods in the bag, and no one contradicted him, the liability of the defendant seems established. Saleeby v. Cent. R. R. of N. J., 99 App. Div. 163, 90 N. Y. Supp. 1042. The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 N.Y.S. 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaffe-v-pennsylvania-railroad-nyappterm-1905.