Jaffe v. National League for Nursing

222 A.D.2d 233, 635 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12727
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 222 A.D.2d 233 (Jaffe v. National League for Nursing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaffe v. National League for Nursing, 222 A.D.2d 233, 635 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered December 16, 1994, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, the motion is granted with respect to the first cause of action, alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

This is a case of alleged employee harassment and intimidation, leading to forced resignation. While we reject the notion that the Workers’ Compensation Law provides an exclusive remedy for such intentional torts (Thompson v Maimonides Med. Ctr., 86 AD2d 867, 868; see, Orzechowski v Warner-Lambert Co., 92 AD2d 110, 112), the facts fall short of the rigorous standard of outrageous conduct necessary to maintain a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress (see, Howell v New York Post Co., 81 NY2d 115, 121-122). The general rule is that an employee at will may be discharged "at any time for any reason or even for no reason” (Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp., 58 NY2d 293, 300), and courts will closely scrutinize complaints which seek to circumvent this rule with allegations of intentional infliction of emotional distress (58 NY2d, supra, at 303; Ranieri v Lawlor, 211 AD2d 601; Hurwitch v Kercull, 182 AD2d 1013, 1014-1015).

We agree, however, that the allegation of "a hard slap on [plaintiffs] backside,” during an outburst of rage by the individual defendant, met the criteria of offensive and intentional bodily contact (Masters v Becker, 22 AD2d 118, 120) in stating a cause of action for assault and battery. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Madrigal v. Montefiore Med. Ctr.
2021 NY Slip Op 00526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Cowan v. City of Mount Vernon
95 F. Supp. 3d 624 (S.D. New York, 2015)
Baliva v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
286 A.D.2d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Carroll v. Bayerische Landesbank
150 F. Supp. 2d 531 (S.D. New York, 2001)
Perks v. Town of Huntington
96 F. Supp. 2d 222 (E.D. New York, 2000)
Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
89 F. Supp. 2d 506 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Pepe v. Maklansky
67 F. Supp. 2d 186 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Sowemimo v. D.A.O.R. Security, Inc.
43 F. Supp. 2d 477 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Ticali v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn
41 F. Supp. 2d 249 (E.D. New York, 1999)
Cerick v. MTB Bank
240 A.D.2d 274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Caballero v. First Albany Corp.
237 A.D.2d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Nunez v. A-T Financial Information, Inc.
957 F. Supp. 438 (S.D. New York, 1997)
Cote v. NH College
D. New Hampshire, 1997

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 A.D.2d 233, 635 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaffe-v-national-league-for-nursing-nyappdiv-1995.