Jaffe v. George Construction Co.

54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14123
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 30, 1976, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. There was sufficient evidence in the record to support the referee’s report that petitioner Matt Jaffe, in his individual capacity, was a party to the contract. The referee properly found, and the petitioner concedes, that Matt Jaffee Associates, Inc., is an entity separate from Matt Jaffe and not a party to the agreement. Matt Jaffe personally negotiated the agreement and his signature thereto does not indicate he signed in a representative capacity. Matt Jaffe Insurance, referred to in the contract, is not a corporation and is not a separate and distinct entity. The use of the word insurance in the name Matt Jaffe Insurance was merely descriptive of the nature of the business of Matt Jaffe. The other contentions proffered by petitioner, including his argument that respondent George Construction Co., Inc., was not a party to the agreement, are not tenable. Concur&emdash;Murphy, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaffe v. George Construction Co., 54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 631 (Jaffe v. George Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kahn v. Biernbaum
55 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)