Jaffa v. Libman

190 N.W. 894, 153 Minn. 557, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 860
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jaffa v. Libman. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 Minn. 553
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 1, 1922·No. No. 23,142·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the record in this cause leads to the conclusion that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding of the jury to the effect that the truck in question, the property of defendant, and of the negligent operation of which complaint is made, was being driven on the particular occasion by defendant’s minor son and with defendant’s authority, rendering him liable for the negligent operation of the same. The evidence brings the case within the rule applied in Jensen v. Fletcher, 134 Minn. 366, 159 N. W. 827. A discussion of the evidence would serve no useful purpose.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaffa v. Libman, 190 N.W. 894, 153 Minn. 557, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 860 (Mich. 1922).

190 N.W. 894 (Jaffa v. Libman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jensen v. Fischer
159 N.W. 827 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1916)