Jafari v. City of Richmond

211 F. App'x 200
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2006·No. No. 06-1767·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Emmett Johnson Jafari appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c (2000), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), denying Jafari’s motion to set aside judgment, and granting Defendants’ petition for attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jafari v. City of Richmond, No. 3:05-cv-00823-HEH (E.D. Va. May 12, 2006; May 30, 2006; June 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jafari v. City of Richmond, 211 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2006).

211 F. App'x 200 (Jafari v. City of Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, Va.
678 F. Supp. 2d 348 (E.D. Virginia, 2009)