Jaehnig v. State

122 S.W. 267, 57 Tex. Crim. 186, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 394
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 3, 1909
DocketNo. 101.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 122 S.W. 267 (Jaehnig v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaehnig v. State, 122 S.W. 267, 57 Tex. Crim. 186, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 394 (Tex. 1909).

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of simple assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $10.

Appellant complains that the information is defective in that it attempts to charge an aggravated' assault and, therefore, is insufficient in that it nowhere states the manner in which the instrument charged was used, and that the court misdirected the jury as to the law of aggravated assault. Conceding this was true, appellant was only convicted of a simple assault and fined $10, therefore, appellant cannot complain of same. The court properly charged on simple assault, and the jury properly found appellant guilty under the evidence as disclosed in the record. See McCutcheon v. State, 49 Texas Crim. Rep., 607, 16 Texas Ct. Rep., 444.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson v. Texas Co.
239 S.W. 671 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Hughes-Buie Co. v. Mendoza
156 S.W. 328 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 S.W. 267, 57 Tex. Crim. 186, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaehnig-v-state-texcrimapp-1909.