Jaeger v. Hannan

111 A. 926, 92 N.J. Eq. 257, 7 Stock. 257, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 327
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 21, 1920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance—Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Taylor—7. For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Minturn, Kalisci-t, Black, Heppenheimer—5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaeger v. Hannan, 111 A. 926, 92 N.J. Eq. 257, 7 Stock. 257, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 327 (N.J. 1920).

111 A. 926 (Jaeger v. Hannan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

536 Broad St. Corp. v. Valco Mortgage Co., Inc.
38 A.2d 903 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Sun B. L. Assn. v. Rashkes
183 A. 274 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)