Jaeger v. Converse

Ohio Supreme Court

Jaeger v. Converse

87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 486

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 26, 1912·No. No. 13015·Published

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; this court being of the opinion that the erroneous instructions by. the court to the jury at the times, and in the manner complained of, were not prejudicial since upon the whole record this court finds that the judgment was correct.

Spear, Shauck, Johnson, Donahue and O’Hara, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; this court being of the opinion that the erroneous instructions by. the court to the jury at the times, and in the manner complained of, were not prejudicial since upon the whole record this court finds that the judgment was correct.

Spear, Shauck, Johnson, Donahue and O’Hara, JJ., concur.

Jaeger v. Converse, 87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 486 (Ohio 1912).

Pincite

87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 486 (Jaeger v. Converse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.