Jaeger v. Converse

Ohio Supreme Court

Jaeger v. Converse

87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 486

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 26, 1912

DocketNo. 13015

StatusPublished

This text of 87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 486 (Jaeger v. Converse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jaeger v. Converse, 87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 486 (Ohio 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; this court being of the opinion that the erroneous instructions by. the court to the jury at the times, and in the manner complained of, were not prejudicial since upon the whole record this court finds that the judgment was correct.

Spear, Shauck, Johnson, Donahue and O’Hara, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; this court being of the opinion that the erroneous instructions by. the court to the jury at the times, and in the manner complained of, were not prejudicial since upon the whole record this court finds that the judgment was correct.

Spear, Shauck, Johnson, Donahue and O’Hara, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaeger-v-converse-ohio-1912.